Skip to Content

Is BMI meaningless, especially for kids?

This post may contain affiliate links and/or codes. You won’t pay anything extra, but I might make a commission.

I was quoted this morning in a piece on ABCNews.com about tracking kids’ health through the use of BMI. An adult’s BMI is calculated using height and weight, and that number puts you in the underweight, normal, overweight, or obese category. It doesn’t take into account muscle mass, cholesterol, blood pressure, sugar levels, activity levels, waist size, or any other indicator of health and fitness.

And when you start talking about BMI for kids, it gets more complicated, because a BMI that’s considered OK for a ten-year-old is obese for a seven-year-old. I don’t think using BMI to track kids’ health is a good idea at all. (However, unlike most of the commenters on the ABC piece, I don’t think trying to improve kids’ health is a commie-liberal-big brother idea either – those commenters get paranoid and nutty pretty fast.)

Whether a kid is healthy or not is complicated. My son was in the top 5% on the BMI charts for a seven-year-old when he was seven, which is what triggered the note home. The problem is that the kids’ charts compare kids by age. My son was towering over the other kids in his class, so the comparison was completely out of whack. The charts allow for the fact the older kids are supposed to have a higher BMI, but not for kids who are very tall for their age.

It’s just one of those things where a number or a label without information is useless. I knew the assessment was ridiculous, but had to actually look up the info and explain the BMI-by-age concept to my husband to talk him down after he saw the letter. He’s not a stupid guy. He’s actually quite smart, smarter than me in many ways. But the government told him his son was obese and he took them at their word. That’s a problem on many levels.

What’s the answer? I have no clue. I’m lucky that I have one kid who chooses to eat like a health nut and another who is active enough that he burns off the huge amount of carbs that he consumes. If one of them had a health problem I would expect my doctor to talk to me about it. He’s got all of my kids’ information right there in front of him, and even more important, he’s got my kids right in front of him.

Does he need the government’s guidance when talking to me about my kids’ weights? I don’t think so, but if they’re going to tell him anything, I’d rather it be something useful, like whether or not my kids can run and play with their classmates and how they do on fitness tests. What their blood tests should look like. And yes, whether their measurements are in a safe range, based on many factors. Using one number to target kids will include kids who don’t need the intervention and exclude kids who actually need the help.

DyNama

Saturday 3rd of April 2010

applying adult weight and shape standards to children is a recipe for disaster because it can't take into account their stage of development and, as you point put in your blog, the wonderful diversity of shapes and sizes. i worry that kids are not getting the nutrition they need to grow and thrive out of fears more properly placed upon adults. the way the dad reacted, he might have put Jake on a diet! it is a myth that today's children might have a shorter lifespan--there is zero evidence that that is happening--but in my opinion the only thing that could cause that is adopting unhealthy "healthy lifestyles".

Amy

Saturday 3rd of April 2010

@Sarah - I know, they're trying to find an easy way to target the at risk kids but there just isn't one. I mean, truly obese kids are like porn, you know it when you see it. But God forbid the assessment would be made based on common sense - the school would get sued in five minutes.

Sarah

Saturday 3rd of April 2010

I have to say I agree. My 6 year old daughter would be considered obese. What these charts fail to recognize is that she is far off the growth charts in both height and weight and has been since she was 2 months old. She currently weighs around 68 pounds and is over 50 inches tall. She also is a competitive athlete and is all muscle. At her check-up last week her doctor commented on her muscle definition and how low her resting heart-rate was. All signs of a very healthy child, yet according to this she isn't. They need to stop trying to shove everyone into a cookie-cutter image.

Amy

Thursday 4th of March 2010

@Toni - The funny thing is, I saw the number and said "What's wrong with the system?" while my husband saw the number and said "What's wrong with us?" I wonder what a psychologist would do with THAT!

Toni

Thursday 4th of March 2010

Yes -- goes without saying in my mind, so I forgot to say it here -- I've known Jake his entire life, and in no way, shape or form is he, or has he ever been, obese. I wouldn't even call him overweight. He's got a big frame, big shoulders, but he's fit and active. So there's definitely something wrong with that system. Toni´s last blog ..iPad may go on sale March 26th — getting ready for iBooks

Privacy Policy ~ Full Disclosure ~ Disclaimer